- CCT Public Page
- [CCT Members Area]
A couple of climbers were witness today to employees from the Launceston City Council chopping bolts and anchors from climbs on the shady side of the Cataract Gorge! The employees said they were under instruction to remove all the bolts from the shady side of the gorge to stop climbers accessing these climbs.
Despite the current 'code of conduct for rock climbing within the Cataract Gorge' (published by the council), this has started without any apparent public consultation and is a major issue for climbing access.
What can we do?
We have contacted a member of council who will find out tomorrow where the directive to remove the bolts has come from.
We plan to write letters to the Editor to make the issue public.
Anyone with ideas or experience in dealing with council regarding access or policy, could you please offer suggestions on this forum or get in contact with myself or Anna to discuss a way forward. Also, please contact council or media directly as you feel is appropriate.
Your immediate and public support for this issue is essential to ensure the climbing community can continue to climb in the Gorge.
Cheers
Andrew
16 Comments
Adam Gibson
So I just spoke with Jill from Launceston City Councils Parks and Recreation division, she was unaware of the works but committed to raise the issue with the Department head (who is away today) and that he would call me on Friday.
As for the council's failure to consult, is there a Tasmanian representative body for climbers for the council to consult with? I'm a Queenslander and our absence of an effective representative body for climbing (until the middle of last year) was - with hindsight - the key factor in losing access to a number of crags.
-Adam Gibson
Adam Gibson
Oh and while I'm thinking about it, I'm extremely impressed with the Launceston City Council Rock Climbing Code of Conduct. I've got quite an interest in climbing policy and land manager climbing related signage/publications and that is amongst some of the most well thought-out and clearly laid out work I've come across in the last 10 years.
Kudos to LCC for the brochure, not so much for randomly chopping the bolts.
-Adam Gibson
Jon Nermut
Hi guys,
Thanks for raising this. Do you have email or postal addresses for the council or councillors that we can write to to voice our concern?
The code of conduct mentioned is available here:
http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/upfiles/lcc/cont/parks_and_recreation/pdfs/gorge/rock_climbing_code_of_conduct.pdf
Emlyn Jones
Hi Andrew,
Do you have any specifics, i.e. which climbs the bolts were chopped from, or whether they were rap anchors at the top or on the actual climb? It would be worthwhile getting these details. It would be unlikely that your typical council worker would have the required qualification to remove bolts from the route!
Emlyn Jones
Andrew Geeves AUTHOR
The climbs that were chopped yesterday:
Schizo
The New Move
Prohibitionist
No Dams
All lead bolts and anchors were chopped. They were cut with an angle grinder and there are still shiny, sharp 1cm stubs poking out of the rock.
Adam Gibson
I just got off the phone with Chris Moore from Launceston Parks and Recreation, but having seen your post andrew I'll call you and then call Chris back.
Okay, just got off the phone with Andrew, Tried Chris Moore again but he'd stepped out, he's been sent an email to call me back.
In my initial conversation with Chris he stated that the works stemmed from rockfall on tuesday (which they believed to be climbing related) and was an effort by the council workers to prevent climbing access whilst the rockfall was investigated to see if there were further stability issues and did not reflect a permanent closure. I expressed that chopping bolts was not a suitable mechanism to achieve a temporary closure and suggested the use of lock-out tags or similar and Chris agreed that this would have been a better course.
In the end not enough of what Chris said lines up with the actions occurring on the ground, so I'm going to talk with him again and push further.
-Adam.
Adam Gibson
Okay, jus got back off the phone with Chris Moore from Launceston Park and Recreation.
So a summary to the best of my knowledge at this time;
There was some rockfall on tuesday
Some tourists/walkers said they thought it was caused by someone dangling on a rope
The council believes it was directly related to the adjacent block of climbs and decided to chop these climbs without consultation to prevent further rockfall
I've spoken with a climber who was there yesterday and he (Ian Ferrier) stated that he was confident the rockfall did not relate to climbers on those routes but rather was in an adjacent gully.
Council is seeking to organise a meeting with local climbers to further discuss the issue, if you're interested in attending probably the best thing you can do for now is make a post here, so that Ian or whoever ends up co-ordinating the climbing side of the meeting can get in contact with you.
So there ends the summary.
My thoughts, the council fell well short of reasonable expectations of community consultation on this one. Given the facts of the rockfall, the first step should have been to make an initial assessment of whether there was an immediate risk of further rockfall, then to investigate the cause of the incident, assess whether it was a one-off or likely to re-occur, if the latter they then should have assessed the range of measures available to prevent it re-occurring, consulted with the relevant stakeholders and implemented the selected outcome.
This does not equate to hearing about some rockfall and sending labourers out with angle grinders, poor form Launceston CC, you've done yourselves a disservice here.
-Adam Gibson.
Emlyn Jones
Nice work in following that up Adam and actually talking with council!!
I can see both sides of the argument here:
Council: Council thought that it was climbers, and took actions to minimise hazards and the risk of putting the risk of the general public getting hurt. Lets face it there are many more walkers that use this track than climbers.
Climbers: On the other hand, we as climbers, are disappointed at the type of action that the council implemented.
While I'm not a Launceston local, my beef is with the knee-jerk reaction from the council. If it is deemed that it is safe to climb on these routes again, they will need to be rebolted. I agree with Adam that chopping bolts is not a reasonable way to temporarily close a climbing area, lockout tags would be far more reasonable.
Are LCC likely to follow through with closing the rest of the Shady Side (as mentioned in Andrews post)? If so this is a key point to raise during the consultation period!
Emlyn Jones
Ian Ferrier
Yesterdays antics started with 4 flouro clad workers milling about at the base of the cliff while one dangled from a rope weilding a big crowbar trying to dislodge loose rock. Interestingly, all this was carried out while tourists still walked up and down the path. A few shards of rock were dislodged and they packed up and left. Our thoughts were that there had been a rockfall and they were checking for loose rock. An hour later they were back with the angle grinder again with 4 spectators while one braved the heights on the rope. We were not quick enough to pack up and get to the other side before all bolts were hacked off. The rock fall had occured in a chossy gully to the left of the climbs that no one climbs and can't be reached from the climbs that were chopped. Apparently some tourist reported someone "dangling" near where the rockfall occurred, however, a few minutes later when a council worker returned to witness the offender there was no sign of said climber? My suspicion is one of the local teenagers have had a scramble and pushed a few rocks off.
The council have agreed to the idea of a meeting with those concerned but we have yet to discuss this with the head of the parks department. We will keep everyone posted once we get any progress. At this stage it does not appear to be the start of a mass bolt removal session but the lack of consultation, after all the work that went into the code of conduct, is what has everyone dissapointed.
Ian Ferrier
If you are around Launceston at 3pm tomorrow Sat 20th we are having a quick get together of concerned climbers to get our response to this issue in order prior to going public with a media release. Bob McMahon has volunteered to lead the charge and is suitably fired up about the whole scenario. Meet upstairs at MD’s, see you then.
Ian
Jon Nermut
Did you guys end up doing a media release?
Small news item here: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/19/2825038.htm?site=northtas§ion=news
"temporarily removed the access bolts" with an angle grinder!
Andrew Geeves AUTHOR
Bob issued the media release yesterday. The examiner has published the councils response today. You have to pay to view the examiner online so here is a little extract.
Council has defended itself over removing the bolts. They say "We take rock falls very seriously. We employ contract climbers to survey rock faces to ensure the safety of the general public and climbers, and take their advice on when to remove rocks that could fall." "Mr Sweetnam said the climbing access bolts were removed after a contract climber inspected the area and found another unstable rock nearby."
So is it the councils policy to hack off bolts whenever they find loose rocks nearby a climbing area?
Adam Gibson
Hi folks,
So I thought I was happy and that a mutually acceptable resolution was well and truly on the cards when I last spoke with LCC as of yesterday afternoon. However in reading what they've written and published I simply do not feel it adequately reflects what I was told in telephone conversations and until there is a better correlation between what they say and their written intentions I feel its important we keep on this issue.
As such, I strongly encourage all local climbers to get involved and attend both the climbers meeting and any meetings with LCC. Take the time to ring your climbing partners and friends, a little bit of effort goes a long way in achieving a positive outcome for the climbing community.
Regards,
Adam Gibson.
Ian Ferrier
See below the media release from Bob. A meeting is scheduled at 12.30pm Thursday 25th at the council with Jeremy Ball and Andrew Smith. It would be good to get as many along as possible.
Cheers,
Ian
MEDIA RELEASE Monday Feb 22nd 2010
Rock climbers label decision of Launceston City Council employee to have safety bolts removed from climbs in the Cataract Gorge as irrational.
Climbers met in Launceston on Saturday 20th Feb 2010 to discuss the implications of a rock fall onto the tourist track in the Cataract Gorge and the reaction of the Launceston City Council.
“It is our understanding that Mr. Andrew Smith of the Parks and Recreation branch of the Launceston City Council instructed workers to chop safety bolts from a climbing area in the Cataract Gorge in the vicinity of a recent rock fall,” stated Ian Ferrier of Mountain Designs Launceston.
“The really baffling thing is that the gully from which the boulder dislodged is not even a part of any of the recognized climbs that have been de-bolted,” he continued.
LCC workers abseiled down the buttress and cut the bolts off with an angle grinder.
Bob McMahon, author of the rock climbing guide to the Cataract Gorge, rock climbing instructor with Launceston based wilderness adventure company, Tasmanian Expeditions, and president of Climb Tasmania Incorporated, questioned Mr Smith’s understanding of risk management.
“There have been numerous rock and tree falls in the Gorge over the years. That’s the nature of the place. These incidents have been managed, as one would expect them to have been managed. Warning signs were erected, affected areas cordoned off, track repairs undertaken and slope stabilization work done when necessary,” he explained.
“At no time have rock climbs in the vicinity of any incident been deliberately rendered unclimbable.”
“So what makes this incident any different?”
“Is it because an assumption was made that a climber was responsible for the rock fall, in which case the chopping of the bolts on nearby climbs by LCC workers can be interpreted as collective punishment of climbers in general?” asked McMahon.
“Mr Smith needs to explain the thinking behind his actions and clearly indicate whether or not he means to continue these maverick acts that run contrary to the spirit of communication and engagement that forms the foundation of the Code of Conduct,” concluded McMahon.
Climbers, the Launceston City Council’s Peter Goss and Lucy Marshall and the late Linton Kerber of Sport and Recreation, drew up the climbing Code of Conduct for the Cataract Gorge. Land use managers in other parts of Australia use the Code of Conduct, published by Council as a leaflet, as a model.
“It’s crucial the Launceston City Council liaise with the climbing community if any situations arise in the future. For them to engage in unilateral action only creates conflict and misunderstanding. They have our contact details and we ask them to consult in future. Meanwhile, of course, there is a problem with the vandalised climbs,” said local climber, Rob de Cesare.
CONTACT: Bob McMahon 0448 547290
Ian Ferrier
G’day All,
Just a quick update on today’s very successful meeting. The council has agreed an error was made and that the bolts can be replaced. It appears the officers on the ground made the call to chop the bolts without any further consultation. Climbers will be notified in future if anything similar occurs again. Ongoing we will be reviewing the code of conduct to allow for temporary lockout of climbs should a rock fall occur . This may just involve the use of a simple padlock on the bolts while the area is assessed. All in all a very positive outcome. The council were overwhelmed with the response and did not realise climbers were so passionate about their sport.
Cheers,
Ian
Adam Gibson
Hi Ian, others,
Fantastic, glad to hear that the council was receptive to community concerns, has admitted that the actions were in error and is adopting policies to avoid a repetition of the issue in the future.
The one thing I'd like to see is something in writing from the council saying just that. A press release would be ideal but perhaps excessive, even a simple letter from an appropriate officer summarising what you've stated were the outcomes of the meeting would be sufficient.
-Adam Gibson.